Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Thirty Years of Age or Younger
By Julien Girard, MD, MSc, Donatien Bocquet, MD, Guillaume Autissier, MD, Nicolas Fouilleron, MD, Damien Fron, MD, and Henri Migaud, MD
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery d JBJ S .Org VolumeE 92-A d Number 14 d October 20, 2010
Investigation performed at Centre Hospitalier R´egional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
Background: Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than thirty years of age represents a long-term challenge. As polyethylene wear secondary to a high activity level could be problematic, hard-on-hard bearings have been proposed to reduce wear. The aim of this retrospective case series was to assess the clinical and radiographic results of primary metalon-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients thirty years of age or younger.
Methods: We retrospectively studied thirty-four patients (forty-seven hips) who had undergone metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and analyzed the radiographic and clinical measurements after a mean duration of follow-up of 108 months (range, 62.4 to 153.6 months). The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was twenty-five years (range, fifteen to thirty years). The diameter of the head of the femoral component was 28 mmin all hips except five, in which it was 32 mm. The metal-on-metal bearing was the same in all patients.
Results: The mean Merle d’Aubign´e score increased from 10.6 (range, 1 to 14) to 17.1 (range, 12 to 18). No wear was found on the latest radiograph, but osteolysis was noted in three femora and two acetabula. Two revisions were performed, one because of impingement secondary to cup malorientation and the other because of acetabular loosening with osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis with revision of either component as the end point revealed a ten-year survival rate of 94.5% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 98.6%). The survival rate of the femoral stem was 100%.
Conclusions: These encouraging intermediate-term results indicate that hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearing components may be a suitable solution for young and active patients with hip osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV.
- Predicting Dissatisfaction After THA
- Sex as a Patient Selection Criterion for Metal-on-Metal HRA
- Whole Blood Metal Ion Concentrations
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Painful Metal-On-Metal Hips
- Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing
- Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Outcome at a 5- to 10-Year Interval
- Wear Comparison
- The Incidence of Acetabular Osteolysis in Young Patients
- A Monoblock Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup Has No Osteolysis on CT at 10 Years
- Large Acetabular Defects Can be Managed with Cementless Revision Components
- A Comparison of Two Implant Systems in Restoration of Hip Geometry in Arthroplasty
- Total Hip Arthroplasty Modular Neck Failure
- Revision of Failed THA Acetabular Cups to Porous Tantalum Components
- Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Thirty Years of Age or Younger
- Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing
- Histological Features of Pseudotumor-like Tissues From Metal-on-Metal Hips
- The Prevalence of Groin Pain After Metal-on-Metal THA and THR
- Risk of Complication and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty