Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Outcome at a 5- to 10-Year Interval
Has it Lived Up to Its Expectations?
J. Wesley Mesko, MD,* James A. D'Antonio, MD,y William N. Capello, MD,z Benjamin E. Bierbaum, MD,§ and Marybeth Naughton, BS,•
*Private Practice, Lansing, Michigan;y Private Practice, Sewickley Valley Hospital, Sewickley, Pennsylvania; z Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; § Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New England Baptist and Beth Israel Deconease Hospitals, Boston, Massachusetts; and • Stryker Orthopaedic, Mahwah, New Jersey.
The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 26 No. 2 2011
Abstract: This study reports revision and complication rates of a single cementless double-wedged tapered stem with an alumina-alumina bearing over 10 years since the beginning of premarket clinical trials. Of 930 hips (848 patients) implanted by 9 surgeons, there were 19 revisions at mean follow-up of 5.9 years compared to 10 revisions in the 123 hips implanted with the polyethylene control group at mean 7.8 years. The ongoing safety of alumina-alumina bearings is demonstrated through excellent (96.8%) survivorship at 10 years. Twenty-one patients reported 23 incidences of noise described as clicking, squeaking, popping, or creaking. Eight patients with 9 hips described the noise as squeaking, most occurring rarely and only 1 occurring frequently in a patient subsequently revised for a reason aside from the squeaking.
- Predicting Dissatisfaction After THA
- Sex as a Patient Selection Criterion for Metal-on-Metal HRA
- Whole Blood Metal Ion Concentrations
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Painful Metal-On-Metal Hips
- Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing
- Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Outcome at a 5- to 10-Year Interval
- Wear Comparison
- The Incidence of Acetabular Osteolysis in Young Patients
- A Monoblock Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup Has No Osteolysis on CT at 10 Years
- Large Acetabular Defects Can be Managed with Cementless Revision Components
- A Comparison of Two Implant Systems in Restoration of Hip Geometry in Arthroplasty
- Total Hip Arthroplasty Modular Neck Failure
- Revision of Failed THA Acetabular Cups to Porous Tantalum Components
- Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Thirty Years of Age or Younger
- Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing
- Histological Features of Pseudotumor-like Tissues From Metal-on-Metal Hips
- The Prevalence of Groin Pain After Metal-on-Metal THA and THR
- Risk of Complication and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty