A Monoblock Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup Has No Osteolysis on CT at 10 Years
Todd C. Moen MD, Raju Ghate MD, Noel Salaz BA, Jason Ghodasra BA, S. David Stulberg MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 469:382–386
Background Aseptic osteolysis has been the single most important factor limiting the longevity of a THA. A great deal of attention has been focused on the development of implants and materials that minimize the development of osteolysis. The monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup was designed to minimize osteolysis, but whether it does so is unclear.
Questions/purposes We evaluated the incidence of osteolytic lesions after THA using a monoblock porous tantalum acetabular component.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who had a THA using a monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup. At a minimum of 9.6 years postoperatively (average, 10.3 years; SD, 0.2 years; range, 9.6–10.8 years), a helical CT scan of the pelvis using a metal suppression protocol was obtained. This scan was evaluated for the presence of osteolysis.
Results We found no evidence of osteolysis on CT scan at an average of 10.3 years.
Conclusions Osteolysis appears not to be a major problem at 10 years with this monoblock porous tantalum
acetabular component, but longer term followup will be required to determine whether these findings persist.
Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.
- Predicting Dissatisfaction After THA
- Sex as a Patient Selection Criterion for Metal-on-Metal HRA
- Whole Blood Metal Ion Concentrations
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Painful Metal-On-Metal Hips
- Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing
- Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Outcome at a 5- to 10-Year Interval
- Wear Comparison
- The Incidence of Acetabular Osteolysis in Young Patients
- A Monoblock Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup Has No Osteolysis on CT at 10 Years
- Large Acetabular Defects Can be Managed with Cementless Revision Components
- A Comparison of Two Implant Systems in Restoration of Hip Geometry in Arthroplasty
- Total Hip Arthroplasty Modular Neck Failure
- Revision of Failed THA Acetabular Cups to Porous Tantalum Components
- Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Thirty Years of Age or Younger
- Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing
- Histological Features of Pseudotumor-like Tissues From Metal-on-Metal Hips
- The Prevalence of Groin Pain After Metal-on-Metal THA and THR
- Risk of Complication and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty