Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing
G. Grammatopoulos, H. Pandit, S. Glyn-Jones, P. McLardy-Smith, R. Gundle, D. Whitwell, H. S. Gill, D. W. Murray
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br). Volume 92-B, August, 2010
Pseudotumours are a rare complication of hip resurfacing. They are thought to be a response to metal debris which may be caused by edge loading due to poor orientation of the acetabular component. Our aim was to determine the optimal acetabular orientation to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation.
We matched 31 hip resurfacings revised for pseudotumour formation with 58 controls who had a satisfactory outcome from this procedure. The radiographic inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular component were measured on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse software. The mean inclination angle (47°, 10° to 81°) and anteversion angle (14°, 4° to 34°) of the pseudotumour cases were the same (p = 0.8, p = 0.2) as the controls, 46° (29° to 60°) and 16° (4° to 30°) respectively, but the variation was greater. Assuming an accuracy of implantation of ± 10° about a target position, the optimal radiographic position was found to be approximately 45° of inclination and 20° of anteversion. The incidence of pseudotumours inside the zone was four times lower (p = 0.007) than outside the zone.
In order to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation we recommend that surgeons implant the acetabular component at an inclination of 45° (± 10) and anteversion of 20° (± 10) on post-operative radiographs. Because of differences between the radiographic and the operative angles, this may be best achieved by aiming for an inclination of 40° and an anteversion of 25°.
- Minimal Incision Surgery as a Risk Factor for Early Failure of Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Wear and Range of Motion of Different Femoral Head Sizes
- Restoration of the Center of Rotation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
- The Prevalence of Groin Pain After Metal-on-Metal THA and Total Hip Resurfacing
- Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Thirty Years of Age or Younger
- Current Concepts Review Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Revision of Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty Acetabular Cups to Porous Tantalum Components
- Risk of Complication and Revision THA Among Medicare Patients
- Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing